Since the penalties imposed under Section 76 is upheld, ...

Service Tax

July 16, 2019

Since the penalties imposed under Section 76 is upheld, penalties imposed under Section 78 cannot be justified, Hence the penalties imposed u/s 78 is set aside - In the present case demand of service tax confirmed invoking the extended period of limitation.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Since the penalties imposed under Section 76 is upheld, ...

Service Tax

July 16, 2019

You may also like:

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Misclassification and Wrongful Claim of MEIS Benefits - Exports of quilts containing cotton/polyester - Levy of penalties - The CESTAT found the appellant guilty of...

Classification of micronutrient fertilizers - Presence of nitrogen as a chelating agent - essential constituent - In this remand back case from the Supreme Court, the...

Article – waiver of penalty – rejection of application without reason – not justified

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

Levy of Personal Penalty on the Director of the company and Drivers of the trucks (transporters) - Penalties u/r 26 of CER - Abetment - Clandestine removal - gutka - The...

Penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) - The words may direct that such person shall pay by way of penalty in section 271 leave a certain amount of discretion in imposition of penalty...

Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

Extended period of limitation - penalty - The material facts were unearthed by the Department and hence, non-furnishing of any facts would clearly amount to suppression...

It was open for the Settlement Commission to impose penalty on the directors in addition to imposing penalty on the company, if there was material justifying imposition...

Penalty u/s 112 - since penalty has been imposed on partnership firm under Section 112 (a), separate penalty on its partner would not be justified - AT

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - provisions of Section 78 having been invoked and penalty imposed, Section 76 penalty may not be justified - AT

Smuggling - Prohibited goods - confiscation of cigarettes containers concealed in HDPE granules - Penalty u/s 112 (a) &(b) and 114AA - The Appellate Tribunal upheld the...

Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - Income disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income which is not part of Regular Accounts - CIT(A) directed the AO that levy penalty...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - the income arising on retrospective applicability of section 13(8) inserted by Finance Act, 2012 - returns for all the assessment years in...

Quick Updates: