Revision u/s 263 - Use of word "seems" by the CIT while ...

Income Tax

February 29, 2020

Revision u/s 263 - Use of word "seems" by the CIT while recording reasons - It seems that, Assessment order passed by the A.O. in this case is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue.” The Ld. Pr. CIT has referred the word “seems” twice in para 6 of the above show cause notice. It would, therefore, show that even he was not sure whether it is a fit case of invoking jurisdiction u/s 263 - order set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Use of word "seems" by the CIT while ...

Income Tax

February 29, 2020

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - Lack of enquiry is a reason for taking up the case for revision u/s 263 of the Act but the inadequate enquiry cannot be a reason for taking up the...

Revision u/s 263 - The fact remains that the specific issue raised, in the revision order was specifically looked into, detailed submissions were made and these...

Revision u/s 263 - The words “as he deems necessary”, in our view, do not mean that the Ld. PCIT was left with a choice either to make or not to make an enquiry. As per...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - It is the duty of the AO to ascertain the truth of the facts stated / submitted by the assessee especially when the circumstances of the case...

Appraisal report available but AO ignored, a fit case for revision u/s 263 - HC

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Non reference of matter to the TPO - no prudent business person properly instructed in law would have inferred the TP risk parameter as a...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The fact remains that the specific issue mentioned and has been examined and the contention of the assessee accepted by the Assessing Officer....

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Merely because the AO did not write specific reasons for accepting the explanation of the assessee cannot be reason enough to invoke powers...

Revision u/s 263 - providing accommodation entries - Section 263 requires the CIT to consider the order erroneous after examining the records of the proceedings. Here in...

Revision u/s 263 - CIT setting aside the second reassessment order - time limit to take action u/s 263 - the necessity for the Commissioner to have substantial grounds...

Revision u/s 263 - Invocation of revision proceedings for the second time - As pertinent to point out that there was no bar on limitation by the ld. PCIT to invoke...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

Revision of Assessment order u/s 263 - An order is not erroneous, unless the CIT hold and records reasons why it is erroneous - An order will not become erroneous...

Revision u/s 263 - The word ‘may’ used in Section 263 should be presumed to be shall or otherwise interpreting the word “may” as not mandatory, orders can be passed even...

Quick Updates: