By deciding the question of limitation of AY 2000-01 against ...

Income Tax

October 1, 2020

By deciding the question of limitation of AY 2000-01 against Revenue, and by holding that there was no tax liability for AY 2003-04 and AY 2004-05, these two sets of orders passed by learned Income Tax Appellate Authority have resulted in a serious miscarriage of justice, which we cannot permit. The manner in which the various appeals and Miscellaneous Petition have been dealt with by the learned Tribunal for all the three Assessment years in question leaves much to be desired and the change of stand allowed by the Tribunal and later withdrawal of the appeals for AY 2003-04 and AY 2004-05 under the litigation policy of the CBDT Circular dated 28.01.2016, has resulted in all this goof up. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

By deciding the question of limitation of AY 2000-01 against ...

Income Tax

October 1, 2020

You may also like:

Demand of Entry Tax - machinery imported by the assessee during the A.Y. 2000-2001, but exported outside the country in the year 2004-2005 - The event of subsequent...

Penalty u/s 271-B – failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB - penalty proceedings for the A.Y. 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04 were initiated after the period of...

Treatment of sales tax refund as income under section 41(1) - Decided against the revenue.

Service Tax - Coaching and Training classes - demand imposed on advance fees collected during the period April 2003 to June 2003 - decided in favor of assessee on the...

Disallowance of interest on inter-corporate deposits - The observation of Ld. AO that there was increase in borrowed funds during AY 2003-04 has no relevance since the...

Power of Tribunal to enhance the tax liability - The Tribunal is an independent adjudicatory authority having jurisdiction to determine the liability to pay tax. Under...

Waiver of interest and penalty under Sections 36(1) and 72(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - respondent himself has accepted that he has understated his...

Cessation of liability u/s 41(1) - liability is being carried forward for years and the assessee is not able to completely prove the genuineness of the trading liability...

Rejection of application for rectification of mistake - Applicability of extended period of limitation - Tribunal did not consider the issue sought to rectified - Maybe,...

Date on which Notification coming into force - N/N. 120/2003 dated 01.08.2003 - whether the Notification is effective from the date of publication i.e. 01.08.2003 as...

Non granting interest u/s 244A - AO is hereby directed to pay interest on the refund eligible in accordance with the proviso to Section 244A(1)(a) with regard to the...

Cancellation of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - no prudent purpose could be served for the assessee by filing inaccurate particulars in the current years while the assessee had...

Short paid duty by firm - liability of the partners to make good such shot paid duty - joint and several liability - two / three partnership firms with common partners...

Abatement of value of material - N/N. 12/2003-ST dated 20th June 2003 - discharge of VAT liability would preclude the levy of service tax on the value of those goods

Condonation of delay - to seek that the period of limitation provided in the statute be ignored in case of Revenue's appeals cannot be accepted. The Appeals which are...

Quick Updates: