Rectification u/s 254 - Tribunal decided the appeal of the ...

Income Tax

December 21, 2020

Rectification u/s 254 - Tribunal decided the appeal of the Revenue on merits and ex-parte - The proviso to Rule 25 deals with the situation where the Tribunal has passed an ex-parte order, due to non-appearance of the Respondent, even though the order was passed on merits. Thus, we are of the opinion that the reasoning given in para 6 of the Impugned Order is beyond the scope and ambit of Rules 25 of the ITAT Rules. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rectification u/s 254 - Tribunal decided the appeal of the ...

Income Tax

December 21, 2020

You may also like:

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - ex-parte order on merit - assessee produced certain records after ex-parte order - factual aspect whether the assessee has received...

Rejection of application u/s 254(2) by the ITAT to re-call the order - order was passed ex-parte - non appearance of assessee - No litigant would stand benefited by not...

Ex-parte order by CIT (Appeals) - Section 250(6) enjoins that the CIT(A) shall state the points for determination before it and the decision shall be rendered on such...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - non consideration of decision refereed by the assessee in dealing with appeal - a mistake apparent from record - Tribunal recalled its order.

Rectification of mistake u/s. 254(2) - Scope of tribunal in rectification - review of the order passed by the Tribunal in the guise of rectification which is not...

Ex-parte order - The order, ex parte in nature, passed in violation of the principles of natural justice, entails civil consequences; (c) It is also found that the...

Rectification u/s mistake u/s 254 - apparent mistake in the order of Tribunal warranting rectification - scope of section 254(2) is limited to rectification of mistake...

Rectification u/s 254 - The High Court acknowledges that the Tribunal is the final authority to ascertain facts. However, it must rectify any apparent mistakes in its...

Rectification of order - Tribunal has tried to consider the issue on merits which was already considered by the Tribunal earlier while deciding the appeal – the...

Power of Tribunal to dismiss the Appeals for want of prosecution - Even if the assessee could not appear, the Tribunal should decided the appeal on merits, ex parte,...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court - When the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review the order passed by them,...

Rectification u/s 254 - Addition u/s 68 - non-consideration of certain facts in Order of the Tribunal - ignoring the material already on record on the part of the...

Validity of orders that were ex parte in nature - The order are ex facie, bad in law, because (a) violation of principles of natural justice, i.e. Fair opportunity of...

Power of Tribunal u/s 254 to dismiss the appeal in limine - non prosecution - the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal only on the ground of non prosecution without...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - in the guise of rectification, the Revenue is seeking review of the order of Tribunal, which is beyond the scope of powers as...

Quick Updates: