Cheating - allegation is that the petitioner had given a false ...

Case Laws Indian Laws

February 12, 2021

Cheating - allegation is that the petitioner had given a false statement before the Revenue Authorities - The best allegation against the petitioner is that he suppressed the business relations between the petitioner and the complainant company with the Revenue Authorities to save tax. For this the complainant cannot be said to have been cheated. The revenue authorities, which was the only appropriate authority, has already imposed punishment upon the petitioner’s company as per law. Thus, there is no application of Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code in this case. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Cheating - allegation is that the petitioner had given a false ...

Case Laws Indian Laws

February 12, 2021

You may also like:

Determination of sales turnover - When the assessing authorities could accept the explanation of the assessee for the subsequent years, there is no reason for them to...

Valuation - Reliance on the statement made before the customs officers - recording of statement u/s 108 - Certainly a statement recorded under duress or coercion cannot...

Validity of retraction of the statement made in survey proceedings u/s 133A - It is always open for the revenue authorities to examine the correction of the retraction...

Use of materials seized and the statement furnished by the third parties against the assessee - the opportunity for the rebuttal to the assessee for the seized documents...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The “concealment“ was detected only during the scrutiny. The assessee has given the false statement. On false estimate/statement, the penalty is...

Recovery of CENVAT Credit alongwith interest and penalty - second stage dealers were issuing invoices without actually supplying goods - Examining the records of each of...

Assessment us 153A - Statement of assessee alone cannot be the basis for making any estimated additions against the assessee. May be the assessee has retracted from the...

Professional misconduct by CA - The NFRA concluded that the actions of the firm and the engagement partner constituted professional misconduct. They failed to cooperate...

Validity of statement - retraction of statement - the statement recorded u/s. 132(4) cannot be discarded merely because the retractment statements were filed. The...

Estimation of income - Accommodation entry provider - the only material with the Revenue authorities is that of the statement of entry operators confirming that they...

Penalty for false invoice - Section 55(2) AP VAT Act states that any VAT dealer, who issues a false tax invoice or receives and uses a tax invoice, knowing it to be...

Clandestine Removal - statements recorded by Revenue - The Commissioner has clearly ignored this findings and come to a difference conclusion. While doing so he is...

Levy of penalty u/s 114 - corroborative evidences like statements of the co-noticees - it is clear that the statements of a person made under Section 108 of the Act 1962...

Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained cash deposits - statement of the assessee admitting the income at the time of survey - subsequent retraction made by assessee - it is not...

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - AO made addition of loan based on statement of a person who retract subsequently - it is the revenue which had placed reliance on the...

Quick Updates: