Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2021 Year 2021 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee has failed to explain the ...

Income Tax

June 5, 2021

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee has failed to explain the source with support of evidence, but his explanation was not found to be false. The lapse committed at his end may authorise the AO to make addition, but that will not authorise the AO to visit the assessee with penalty. The explanation of the assessee ought to have been found as false by the AO. Nothing that sort of exercise has been made or any material discernible from the record. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure on the part of legal heir of the deceased assessee to explain the source of part of the deposits - The mere failure on the part of the...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - loan from friends and relatives for financing his son’s USA visa - when the evidences and explanation furnished in support of cash credits are...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee has explained the entries with necessary evidences and said explanation is not found to be false, then merely for the reason...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of excessive depreciation - cost of acquisition of wind mill - whether or not assessee is entitled to the benefit under proviso to...

  6. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

  7. Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - unexplained investment u/s.69 - The penalty can be justified only if assessee fails to offer an explanation or his explanation is found to be...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the claim of the assessee was found to be false claim and explanations offered by the assessee were found by the Revenue to be false and clearly...

  10. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has surrendered and agreed for the additions at the assessment stage merely to buy peace of mind and to avoid further litigation...

  11. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

  12. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) - assessee failed to give reasons for non-compliance of statutory notice u/s. 142(1) - till the disposal of appeal by the CIT(A) the assessee...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - difference of income in the return filed u/s.139(1) and 153A - there was no such allegation that of assessee was found to be the owner of any...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - surrender was not voluntary - assessee failed to explain the difference between the assessed income and returned income - penalty confirmed - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates