Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2021 Year 2021 This

Revision u/s 263 - Jurisdiction of AO - There was no change of ...

Income Tax

June 28, 2021

Revision u/s 263 - Jurisdiction of AO - There was no change of jurisdiction sought by the Revenue as per Section 124 read with Section 120 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Thus, on the point of jurisdiction relating to issuance of notice also makes the notice under Section 143(2) void-ab-initio. These aspects were not challenged by the assessee as the Assessing Officer assessed the income of the assessee at Nil and the assessee therefore, never challenged the assessment order at any stage. As the assessment itself becomes bad in law and therefore, the order of the Principal CIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 itself becomes nullity as there is no assessment order in the eyes of law. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposit during the demonization period - The tribunal noted that the AO had conducted an adequate inquiry into the assessee's cash...

  2. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - the assessee had duly explained as to why certain receipts though subjected to TDS, would not be liable to be offered to tax such as...

  3. Appraisal report available but AO ignored, a fit case for revision u/s 263 - HC

  4. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - there is a huge difference in invoice value and the duty paid as per the Annexure-15 and the ITS data available -reconciliation should have...

  5. Revision u/s 263 - Ld. Pr. CIT exercising jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act, directed the AO to make fresh assessment on the issues which were not the subject...

  6. Revision u/s 263 - cash expenditure , prior period expenses, provisions for incentive etc. - CIT has not exercised jurisdiction u/s 263 on the ground of ‘no enquiry’ or...

  7. Revision u/s.263 - In absence of information at the time of completion of the assessment the AO could not have asked the assessee to explain the cash transactions - on...

  8. Revision u/s 263 - the ld PCIT had invoked revision jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act on the very same point of allowability of LTCL. Hence it could be safely concluded...

  9. Revision u/s 263 - It is evident that A.O. made enquiries on the issue and assessee complied to the enquiries and filed all the required details. Thus, it is not a case...

  10. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - bogus loss on shares - penny stock transactions - Reliance on audit objection given by the audit party - As safely concluded that the ld. AO...

  11. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Jurisdiction exercised by ld PCIT under section 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. PCIT has selected the item (share capital and...

  12. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - As both the issues in question on the basis of which the Pr.CIT had assumed jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act had been considered and decided in...

  13. Revision u/s 263 - The failure to compute assessee’s income u/s 115JB, in our considered opinion, would certainly make the order liable for exercise of revisional...

  14. Revision u/s 263 - The principal of the law emanating that when two views are legally possible and AO adopts one view the Assessment Order cannot be said to be erroneous...

  15. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - Since the aforesaid exercise was carried out by the second AO in the reassessment...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates