Validity of order passed u/s 74(1) - No sufficient time was ...

GST

June 30, 2021

Validity of order passed u/s 74(1) - No sufficient time was afforded to the petitioner to represent his case; (b) order of assessment passed ex parte in nature, does not assign any sufficient reasons even decipherable from the record, as to how the officer could determine the amount due and payable by the assessee. The order, ex parte in nature, passed in violation of the principles of natural justice, entails civil consequences. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of order passed u/s 74(1) - No sufficient time was ...

GST

June 30, 2021

You may also like:

Validity of Ex-parte order passed u/s 74 - No sufficient time was afforded to the petitioner to represent his case; (b) order passed ex parte in nature, does not assign...

Validity of orders that were ex parte in nature - The order are ex facie, bad in law, because (a) violation of principles of natural justice, i.e. Fair opportunity of...

Violation of principles of natural justice - ex-parte order - No sufficient time was afforded to the petitioner to represent his case; (b) order passed ex parte in...

Ex-parte order - disallowance of Input Tax Credit and further imposing of tax - No sufficient time was afforded to the petitioner to represent his case and (b) order...

Validity of summary order passed u/s 140 and 43(9) - Matching of credit - Violation of principles of natural justice - order passed ex-parte in nature - Violation of...

Levy of interest - No sufficient time was afforded to the petitioner to represent his case; (b) order passed ex parte in nature, does not assign any sufficient reasons...

Validity of assessment order u/s 144-C (4) - period of limitation - Neither Circular no.8/2021 nor notification no.74/2021 dated 25.6.2021 or press release dated...

Validity of Show cause notice (SCN) u/s 74 - Under Section 74(1) notice is an independent notice to be issued in DRC-01, whereas the notice under Section 74(5) was to be...

Validity of order passed u/s 201(1)/201(1A) - Period of limitation - prior to section 201 was amended by Finance Act No.2 of 2009, no time limit was provided for passing...

Validity of Show cause notice issued u/s 74 - Erroneous Refund - Section 74(1) of the OGST Act does not appear to make any distinction between those refund orders that...

Order u/s 201(1)/201(1A) - sufficient opportunity - the date of orders passed by the AO reveal that from the date of issuance of SCN to the date of passing of orders u/s....

Prosecution, u/s 132(1)(c) of the Central Act - parallel proceedings u/s 74 - There is no principle in law as may warrant any interference in the present petition to...

Violation of principles of natural justice (audi alterem partem) - In the present case, when the petitioner had cancelled its registration in the year 2019, a proper...

Faceless assessment u/s 144B - time-limit to complete the assessment - Even if for a moment we hold that Relaxation Act is applicable to petitioner’s case, the...

Initiation of CIRP u/s 9 - time limitation - threshold limit of amount claimed - With respect to 234 invoices, which are payable within 30 days of the invoices, 224...

Quick Updates: