Levy of penalty on Customs Broker - Section 114AA of the Customs ...

Customs

August 17, 2021

Levy of penalty on Customs Broker - Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - the Department has failed to prove that there was a mala fide and wilful mis- representation by the Customs Broker. It seems that the Commissioner (Appeals) has totally misunderstood the facts and has wrongly observed that the appellant (Customs Broker) and the exporter have been operating from the same premises and have an identical ICE Code which leads one to suspect the bona fides of the appellant. This finding of the Commissioner is factually incorrect and without any basis - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty on Customs Broker - Section 114AA of the Customs ...

Customs

August 17, 2021

You may also like:

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 114AA of Customs Act - illegal export of red sanders out of India - misuse of Import Export Code (IEC) - the Revenue has failed to establish the mala...

Enhancement of penalty, levied on Employee of CHA - appellant was reckless and negligent in using the Customs House Agent Licence of his Employer. - Smuggling - red...

Seeking a sum which represents the value of goods destroyed by the Customs authorities - The Customs authorities cannot be saddled with refunding of the value of the...

Penalty u/s 271B - failure to file audit report on due date - penalty levied u/s 271B cannot be levied for the reason that there was a failure on the part of the...

Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - mala fide intention - the corporate applicant filed the application with mala fide intention and with ulterior motive for...

Export of the goods - claim of duty drawback - Mere allegation of wrong classification without proving intentional mala fide cannot lead to imposition of penalty - CGOVT

Revocation of Customs Broker licence - forfeiture of security deposit - There is no material on record to attribute any mala fide on the part of the Customs Broker...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

‘Consulting Engineering Services' - it is onus on the department to prove that the appellant has received this amount as “Consulting Engineering Firm” which the...

Imposition of penalty u/s 112 (d) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - appellant was only a Customs Broker and not the importer - the only allegation...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - bona fide or mala fide with an intention to evade taxes - not exigible to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act where the...

Confiscation - Smuggling of Betel Nuts - discharge of burden to prove u/s 123 of Customs Act - The betel nut is not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962...

Quick Updates: