Law for trial of the cross cases - Raid - In the present ...

Customs

November 2, 2021

Law for trial of the cross cases - Raid - In the present controversy, two different criminal appeals were being heard and decided against two different judgments based upon evidence recorded in separate trials, though for the commission of the same offence. As such, the High Court fell into an error while passing a common judgement, based on evidence recorded in only one trial, against two sets of accused persons having been subjected to separate trials. The High Court ought to have distinctly considered and dealt with the evidence of both the trials and then to decide the culpability of the accused persons. - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Law for trial of the cross cases - Raid - In the present ...

Customs

November 2, 2021

You may also like:

Levy of service tax - export of services or not - Distinct Person - In the present case the appellant are on better footing as they have constitutionally two different...

Revenue Appeal against one order of Commissioner Appeal whereas Commission has decided two cases simultaneously on similar issues - Though res judicata may not strictly...

Money Laundering - Return of unrelied upon documents seized during raid - There is no doubt that every accused has a right to fair trial but in the present case the...

Right to information - The law does not contemplate filing of two First Appeals before two different FAAs. Hence, the passing of two different orders by two different...

Dishonour of Cheque - lack of territorial jurisdiction to try the case - The petitioners on receipt of the summons from the Court had participated in the trial cross...

Right of department to file any appeal or cross-objections before the Commissioner (Appeals) against Refund order - the Department could neither have filed an appeal...

Seizure of tobacco and loss of the same due to file - Liability of central excise department - Whether the Trial Court has committed error of facts and law in passing...

Dishonor of Cheque - The Trial Court has failed to appreciate the burden of proof and drawing presumption. Only on untenable contentions and evidence, the Trial Court...

Deduction u/s 54 - investment in two different houses - The Hon’ble Court’s opinion is that, the physical structure of a new residential house whether it is literal or...

Right to speedy trial - Allegation of corruption on the ASI / Policer officer posted at Railway - Abetment in evasion of duty - Inordinate delay in filing the PR/final...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - UOI, which has competent legal advice at its command, cannot, particularly in the facts of the present case, be heard to contend...

Attachment orders under PMLA - Two different enactments, i.e., the PMLA, 2002 and the I and B Code provide two different hierarchies of functionaries to decide the...

Admissibility of appeal - time limitation - appeal not filed on time - in any foreseeable case, the last date for filing of appeal under law in the instant case was...

Dishonor of Cheque - initiation of Criminal Case - Whether a criminal case initiated under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, after ending in conviction and reach...

Levy of penalty on additions of admitted amount during assessment proceedings - CIT(A) deleted the penalty - Company has already liquidated - when the respondent company...

Quick Updates: