Validity of Winding up order - Antrix, which initiated the ...

Insolvency and Bankruptcy

January 20, 2022

Validity of Winding up order - Antrix, which initiated the proceedings for winding up, is neither a financial creditor nor an operational creditor nor a corporate applicant. This is why Antrix have not and could not have gone for insolvency resolution process, under the IBC, but taken recourse to Section 271(c) of the Companies Act, 2013. Hence the ratio in Jignesh Shah, as applicable to debts, whose recovery in any case should not have been time barred on the date of initiation of the proceedings for winding up/insolvency resolution process, cannot have any application to the case on hand. - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Winding up order - Antrix, which initiated the ...

Insolvency and Bankruptcy

January 20, 2022

You may also like:

Initiation of CIRP - Assignment of debt during pendency of the proceeding u/s 7 - there is no prohibition in the IBC or any of the Regulations from continuing the...

Liquidation proceedings - Scope of the term "Party" - the proceedings for winding up of a company are actually proceedings in rem to which the entire body of creditors...

Admission of section 7 application - financial debt or not - The Tribunal affirmed that the disbursal of ₹5 crores to the corporate debtor by the financial...

Initiation of CIRP - pre-admission stage - home buyers and creditors - corporate debtor has initiated the process of settlement with the financial creditors - whether,...

Without initiating any ‘Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process’ against the ‘Principal Borrower’, it is always open to the ‘Financial Creditor’ to initiate ‘Corporate...

Without initiating any ‘Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process’ against the ‘Principal Borrower’, it is always open to the ‘Financial Creditor’ to initiate ‘Corporate...

CIRP proceedings - Financial Creditors - Related party - while the default rule under the first proviso to Section 21(2) is that only those financial creditors that are...

Threshold limit for triggering CIRP - Validity of Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Initiation of CIRP by Financial Creditors - The statute i.e.,...

Initiation of CIRP - Financial creditor within the meaning of sub-section (7) of Section 5 of the IBC - The Supreme Court affirmed the NCLAT’s judgment, holding that the...

Initiation of CIRP - Flat Buyer is a Financial Creditor or not - Whether ‘HBPL’ falls within the ambit of the definition of ‘Corporate Debtor’, as defined under Section...

CIRP proceedings - on the basis of parity being deployed by the RP in admitting claims of both category of financial creditors, there remains no reason to be aggrieved....

Initiation of CIRP proceedings - In the order of NCLT, there was no finding rendered by the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ as to how a third party payment became a ‘Financial...

Proper officer - Jurisdiction of Initiate investigation proceedings by the Central GST and State GST authorities simultaneously - cross-empowerment - The Court found...

CIRP - Home Buyers - Financial Creditors or not - scope of Financial Debt - The appellants are declared as financial creditors within the meaning of Section 5(8)(f)...

Initiation of CIRP - NCLT rejected the application - Financial Creditors - non-disbursement of part of financial assistance sanctioned by the Financial Creditors -...

Quick Updates: