Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by ...

Income Tax

December 12, 2012

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by ...

Income Tax

December 12, 2012

You may also like:

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - credit worthiness and genuineness of the transaction - Gifts by family friends – the explanation given by the assessee is totally false -...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - willful attempt - assessee has given the explanation in respect of source of jewellery - no case of imposition of penalty - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – mere admission of appeal by the High Court is sufficient to debar the penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has accepted the additions made in the assessment does not by itself justify the imposition of penalty for concealment - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- Wrongful claim of depreciation - The attempts made by the assessee are indicative of frivolous nature of claim - penalty confirmed - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the penalty imposed for disallowing claim of expenditure on foreign education and foreign travelling cannot be upheld - AT

Quick Updates: