Profiteering - Project Suncity Avenue-102 - The Authority ...

Case Laws GST

June 24, 2022

Profiteering - Project Suncity Avenue-102 - The Authority determines that the Respondent has profiteered an amount of Rs. 2,62,56,652/-. Therefore, given the above facts, the Authority under Rule 133 (3) (a) of the CGST Rules orders that the Respondent shall reduce the price to be realized from the buyers of the flats commensurate with the benefit of ITC received by him. - However, the penalty under Section 171 (3A) cannot be imposed on the Respondent retrospectively. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - Project Suncity Avenue-102 - The Authority ...

Case Laws GST

June 24, 2022

You may also like:

Profiteering - four towers/blocks of the project Celebrity Gardens - The Authority finds and determines that the Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs....

Profiteering - construction service - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The Authority finds that, had the Respondent excluded the land...

Profiteering - The instant case does not fall under the ambit of Anti-Profiteering provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 as the Respondent is not executing any...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - The Authority finds no reason to differ from the detailed computation of profiteered amount by the DGAP or the methodology adopted by...

Profiteering - purchase of flats - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the commensurate benefit of ITC to him - post-GST, the Respondent has been...

Order of the Anti Profiteering authority - GST Rule 133 as amended.

Anti-Profiteering - Order of the Authority - Rule 133 of the CGST Rules, 2017 as amended.

Anti-Profiteering - Duties of the Authority - Rule 127 of the CGST Rules, 2017 as amended.

Anti-Profiteering - Secretary to the Authority - Rule 125 of the CGST Rules, 2017 as amended

Anti-Profiteering Authority - Certain provisions under Rules 120, 122 and 124 of GST Rules 2017 amended.

Profiteering - purchase of flats - benefit of Input Tax Credit had not been passed on to the Applicant - The Authority determined amount of Rs. 85,77,419/- (including...

Profiteering - Construction Service supplied by the Respondent - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate...

Profiteering - purchased a flat in the Respondent's project - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of...

Profiteering - supply of Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films where the price of admission ticket - there has been a reduction in the rate...

Profiteering - supply of “Snacks” - benefit of reduction in the rate of tax not passed on - Profiteering proceedings are only concerned with ascertaining whether the...

Quick Updates: