Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest ...

Income Tax

October 11, 2022

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO, cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interest of revenue, for example, when an ITO, adopted one of the course permissible in law and it has resulted in loss of revenue, or where two views are possible and the ITO has taken one view with which the PCIT does not agree, it cannot be treated as an erroneous order prejudicial to the interest of revenue. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest ...

Income Tax

October 11, 2022

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - An incorrect assumption of the fact or an incorrect application of law will satisfy the requirement of the order being erroneous. The phrase...

Exemption granted on Invalid F-Form – Invocation of revision jurisdiction – KGST - If there was error resulting in revenue losing tax, it would be prejudicial to...

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

Revision u/s 263 - valuation of closing stock, non increasing of closing stock by proportionate other direct expenses - The alleged under valuation of closing stock is a...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Total power subsidy and TUF subsidy were wrongly declared by the assessee - When AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has...

Revision u/s 263 - phrase ‘prejudicial to the interest of the revenue’ - every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the...

Revision u.s 263 - assessment order passed pursuant to the revisionary order has resulted in reduction of tax liability - not prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue...

Revision u/s 263 - any loss of revenue as a consequence of an order passed by the Assessing Officer cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of revenue - AT

Validity of Revision u/s 263 - An order which is prejudicial to revenue even if no Tax Loss - The High Court found that the AO's assessment did not adequately address...

Revision u/s 263 - The expression prejudicial to the interest of the revenue is of wide import and is not confined to merely loss of tax. - The term erroneous means a...

Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue - There was a failure on the part of the AO to make such enquiry in order to ascertain the nature of the expenses whether...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - A reading of the same clearly shows that after having made a contradictory observation on issue of lack of enquiry of cash deposit aspect for...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - AO has deemed it fit and proper to treat the cash deposits as the business receipts of the...

Revision u/s 263 - not making the addition of unpaid service tax is erroneous as well as prejudicial to the interest of the revenue - Order of Pr. CIT on this issue confirmed.

Revision u/s 263 - tds credit issue non examination by AO - non examination of an issue by the AO renders the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue

Quick Updates: