Restoration of penalty - The Tribunal is justified in reversing ...

VAT and Sales Tax

November 3, 2022

Restoration of penalty - The Tribunal is justified in reversing the order of the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) as the mandatory provision under section 46(3) of the Act, specifically sub clause (e), declaration was not made by the petitioner to the commercial department to make them aware of such import to the state. The contention that the delivery note and self-declaration were available with the consignment is not enough to show that all the documents necessary for the movement of goods from one state to another as per prescribed under section 46 of the Act is complied. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Restoration of penalty - The Tribunal is justified in reversing ...

VAT and Sales Tax

November 3, 2022

You may also like:

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

Seeking restoration of petition, which was dismissed for non prosecution - The appellate tribunal acknowledges the assignment agreement between Bank of Baroda and the...

Smuggling - Prohibited goods - confiscation of cigarettes containers concealed in HDPE granules - Penalty u/s 112 (a) &(b) and 114AA - The Appellate Tribunal upheld the...

Levy of penalty for abetting in mis-declaration of imported goods - Revocation of Courier License - The tribunal ruled that penalty under this section could only be...

Restoration of name of the company in the Register of Companies - there was no situation to justify the restoration of name of the Company - It is true that this...

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - loss on sale of machinery - The Assessee contested the penalty, arguing that the omission of adding the loss on the sale of machinery to the...

Maintainability of application - initiation of CIRP - NCLT rejected the application for non-appearance - If there is inaction, want of Bonafide, which is imputable to...

Mandatory penalty u/s 11AC - Tribunal had no discretion to reduce the amount of penalty as specified under section 11 AC. - HC

Block assessment - Penalty u/s 158BFA - whether mandatory or discretionary - HC

If there is no mens rea, no mandatory penalty u/s 11AC - SC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - An order in the name of dead person - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged that the penalty order was indeed issued in the name of a deceased...

Adjustment of Penalties from Refund amount - After an appellate order allowed redemption of the seized currency upon payment of fines and penalties, the appellant filed...

Quantum of penalty under section 10(A) of the CST Act - The Tribunal after detailed analysis, came to the conclusion that there was mensrea on the part of the petitioner...

Quantum of mandatory deposit - whether an appellant has to pay 10% mandatory deposit over and above the mandatory deposit of 7.5% of the duty liability/penalties - Held...

Quick Updates: