Validity of assessment order - undue haste in passing the order ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 23, 2022

Validity of assessment order - undue haste in passing the order - the assessee had not been given 5 days time and effectively, they had only 48 hours to submit its reply. With regard to the details regarding the GSTR-1 returns of the other parties is concerned, the assessing officer would state that the portal was kept open. There was nothing on record to indicate that the assessee was put on notice that the portal was kept open and it could do verification so as to reconcile any discrepancy. Thus, we are fully satisfied that there is total violation of principles of natural justice, which would be a good ground to interfere with the assessment order despite an appellate remedy existing over such an order. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of assessment order - undue haste in passing the order ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 23, 2022

You may also like:

Pronouncement of orders not within 90 days - Covid-19 epidemic - Even without the words “ordinarily”, in the light of the above analysis of the legal position, the...

Meaning and Scope of the term 'Actually paid' - Constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act, 2002)

Condonation of delay beyond 90 days - revisional power of High Court u/s 48 of HP VAT - Section 48(1) nowhere expressly excludes the applicability of provisions of the...

Extension of time limitation - provisional order of attachment of immovable properties - whether the Enforcement Directorate (ED) can seek refuge under the orders passed...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Notice issued u/s 148(A)(b) - Period of limitation - It is pertinent to mention here that since the defect committed by the Revenue by...

Validity of the orders passed by the first appellant u/s 92CA (3) on the ground of limitation as contemplated u/s 153 of the Act - Scope of the work "may" - The word...

Correctness of erasure of credit already availed by prospective invalidation of eligibility for retention of credit that would subject those services already procured...

Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

Income accrued in India - section 9(1)(i) - Explanation 5 has been given retrospective effect and Explanations 6 and 7 have been inserted in furtherance of the object of...

Validity of condition imposed under Rule 5(1A) proviso (ii) - the Tribunal was not correct in holding that in the absence of prescription of any time limit under Section...

Time and date from which enhanced duty comes into effect - The presentation of the bill of entry under Section 46 is made electronically and is captured with time stamps...

Provisional attachment - Expiry of 80 days mandatory period for confirmation of the provisional attachment u/s 5 of PMLA - Applicability of decision of Supreme Court for...

Section 48 is not a contravention of the nature prescribed under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 for non-filing of bill of entry within 30 days under Section 48 of...

Faceless Assessment - Whether it cannot be gainsaid that one day time given qua SCN is too short - The first point urged i.e., a mere one day time qua SCN under the...

Action against the Customs Broker (CB) - Time limitation - enquiry report was submitted after expiry of 90 days - The intention of CB to not to enable the Department to...

Quick Updates: