Revision u/s 263 by CIT - addition were made u/s 69 and 69C - ld ...

Income Tax

December 31, 2022

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - addition were made u/s 69 and 69C - ld PCIT has stated that the AO has not applied the rate of tax as per section 115BBE, what he meant was rate of tax of 60% given that the AO has already applied rate of tax of 30% as so submitted by the assessee. - where the AO has erred in not applying the rate of tax as per the amended law as applicable for the impugned assessment year and the order so passed is therefore rightly held by the ld PCIT as erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - addition were made u/s 69 and 69C - ld ...

Income Tax

December 31, 2022

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - Failure of AO levy tax u/s 115BE for the additions made u/s 68 - AO having made addition u/s 68 of the Act, taxing it at the rate prescribed u/s...

Revision u/s 263 - the ld. PCIT had alleged that the ld. AO had not made any enquiry at all on the issue of long term borrowings and other current liabilities. It is not...

Addition u/s 69 - CIT confirmed the additions by Changing the section to section 69C - Addition made by the AO u/s 69 of the Act cannot be converted into Sec. 69C of the...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - if the learned PCIT was of the view that the AO failed to make the necessary enquiries which should have been made during the assessment...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - PCIT failed to specify the transaction on which initiation of penalty either under section 271D or 271E was warranted. And on the issues of...

Revision u/s 263 - Unexplained cash investment u/s 69 - PCIT has no right to review the order which was subject matter of appeal before Ld. CIT(A) and we notice that the...

Revision u/s 263 - The words “as he deems necessary”, in our view, do not mean that the Ld. PCIT was left with a choice either to make or not to make an enquiry. As per...

Revision u/s 263 - wrongful Capital gain computation - As further seen from the Revision Order the assessee has not made the claim of Stamp Duty expenses which is also...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - allowability of ESOP expenditure - No hesitation in holding that assessee had rightly debited the ESOP compensation cost of ₹ 32.55...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Unexplained bank deposits - PCIT, without making further inquiry on his own account, has simply stated in the impugned order that the Assessing...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

Revision u/s 263 by PCIT - claim of deduction u/s 80P - When the rule of consistency has been applied by the ld AO, his order cannot be termed as erroneous without...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Even if we agrees to the contention of the Ld. A.R. of the assessee that Explanation 2(c ) below section 263(1) of the Act is not applicable...

Unexplained money u/s 69A or investment u/s 69 - Once an AO finds that an investment has been made, he has to examine the Assessee's explanation as to the source of that...

Quick Updates: