Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2023 Year 2023 This

Demand of service tax and Penalty u/s 78 of FA - Classification ...

Service Tax

May 3, 2023

Demand of service tax and Penalty u/s 78 of FA - Classification of services - Cargo Handling Service/Business Auxiliary Service, or not - It is noticed that the contracts are not in the nature of ‘Cargo Handling’ but are in the nature of labour contract on piece rate basis. Thus, classification of these services under ‘Cargo Handling Service’ cannot be sustained. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

  2. Demand of service tax from the Sub-contractor - Demand of service tax with interest confirmed - Levy of penalty u/s 77 & 78 waived invoking the provisions of section 80- AT

  3. Valuation - Classification of service - non inclusion of cost recovered towards Transportation and cargo handling - demand confirmed with interest and penalty.

  4. Services of cargo handling - main contractor discharged the entire service tax liability - ST can not be demanded twice from the sub-contractor - demand and penalty set aside - AT

  5. Penalty u/s 78 of FA - there was a confusion at the field level for proper classification of activity undertaken by the appellant as to whether it is under ‘Business...

  6. Classification of service - canvassing air cargo - Business Auxiliary Service or not - H applicant to make a pre-deposit of 50% of the tax demanded - AT

  7. Penalty u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - No malafide can be attributed to the respondent, who is organized under Government of India - No penalty.

  8. Penalty u/s 78 of the FA, 1994 - appellant had correctly advised not to challenged the invocation of the extended period of limitation for recovery of service tax though...

  9. Penalty u/s 78 - failure to discharge tax - Construction services - both the authorities below have rightly imposed and upheld penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

  10. Finance Bill, 2015 - service tax - Substantial overall in levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates