Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2024 Year 2024 This

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) - non filling up of Part 'B' of the ...

GST

January 31, 2024

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - Referencing the judgment in M/s Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd.'s case, the Court observed that the sole allegation was the non-filling of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill without any tax evasion intent. The explanation provided by the petitioner, supported by Ministry of Finance Circulars addressing issues in filling Part 'B', suggested no intent to evade tax. - Observing the absence of tax evasion intent, the High Court quashed and set aside the orders.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Detention of goods - penalty order - Part B of the E-Way Bill was not filled up - The High court observed that the department failed to prove any intention on the...

  2. Levy of Penalty order u/s 129(3) - Neither in the SCN nor in the order u/s 129(3) there was any allegation that non downloading of E-way Bill-02 was done with intention...

  3. Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - goods detained on the ground that the goods were being transported on a vehicle different from...

  4. Levy of penalty for discrepancy in E-way Bill - E-way bills generated without completely filling Part B - The object of circular dated 14.09.2018 was that in case of...

  5. Penalty order u/s 129(3) - non-filling up of Part B of e-way bill - Stock transfer - Since the goods in question were stock transfer from one Unit to another within the...

  6. Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills,...

  7. Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

  8. Penalty u/s 129(1)(b) - Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled up - The High Court held that, upon a perusal of the order in appeal, it is crystal clear that the...

  9. Levy of penalty - the e-way bill had expired one hour fifteen minutes prior to interception - The High Court acknowledged that while the e-way bill had expired, the...

  10. Levy of penalty u/s 129 (3) of the GST Act - Allegation that appellant/petitioner did not generate e-Way Bill with a view to evade tax - Despite the petitioner...

  11. Levy of penalty - e-way bill had expired four days prior to the date of detention - existence of mens rea - The High Court found no evidence of intent to evade tax in...

  12. Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - demand based on mere presumptions - the proceedings has been initiated solely on the basis of...

  13. Validity of Seizure Order u/s 129 (1) - goods not accompanied with E-way bill - Admittedly, till 31st March, 2018 it was not mandatory to download the E-way bill from...

  14. Levy of penalty - goods were seized goods for not accompanied by E-way bills - Upon a purposive reading of the sections 129, 130 and 138, it would suffice to state that...

  15. Incomplete E-way bill - GST - Seizure of goods with vehicle - detention on the ground that Part-B of e-way bill was incomplete - Merely of none mentioning of the vehicle...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates