Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) imposed on minor - The tribunal upheld the ...

Income Tax

April 13, 2024

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) imposed on minor - The tribunal upheld the appellant's argument regarding being a minor, stating that penalty proceedings initiated against a minor without the consent of their guardian are not legally sustainable. Considering this and the lack of additions in the quantum proceedings, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the remaining penalty amount.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) imposed on minor - The tribunal upheld the ...

Income Tax

April 13, 2024

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of...

To impose penalty u/s 271(1)(c), willful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

Penalty imposed u/s 271(1) - Power of reduce or waive penalty u/s 273A - concealment of income - Tribunal was wrong in cancelling the penalty imposed on the assessee...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of the notice issued under Section 142(1) - if the assessee really had no connection with the Swiss Bank accounts,...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the matter travelled to the Tribunal, the explanation which was given by the assessee and accepted by the CIT(A) was once again examined by...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - A.O had clearly failed to discharge his statutory obligation of fairly putting the assessee to notice as regards the defaults for which he was...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Non specification of charge - defective notice - as the A.O had clearly failed to discharge his statutory obligation of fairly putting the...

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

Levying the penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - Just for making wrong claims made advertently or inadvertently, therefore, penalty cannot be levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act and...

Penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) - The words may direct that such person shall pay by way of penalty in section 271 leave a certain amount of discretion in imposition of penalty...

Quick Updates: