Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1984 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1984 (3) TMI 112 - ITAT BOMBAY-CExtract: .......an identifiable party. We see no reason to hold that the company would have resorted to claiming a bogus payment to the extent of Rs. 219 at the first instance. In the context of the Commissioner (Appeals) s finding the case for allowance of the expenditure made out by him has to be supported. 54. In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed.
|