Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  2. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  3. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  4. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  5. Text Search
  6. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  7. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  8. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
1996
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
9
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Case Laws
Showing Results for : Law: AllYear: 1996 Volume: 9
Reset Filters
Results Found:
More details are visible to the Paid members. i.e:- Party Name, Court Name, Date of Decision, Full Text of Headnote and Decision etc.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
High Court's Jurisdiction Upheld Over Tribunal Orders; Speedy Case Disposal Emphasized
The applications under Article 227 of the Constitution were rejected, affirming the Tribunal's decision to address the jurisdiction issue along with other issues for expeditious adjudication as intended by the Debts Recovery Act, 1993. The judgment clarified that the High Court retains jurisdiction under Articles 226 or 227, even if an appeal provision exists under the Act, when the Tribunal's order is without jurisdiction, arbitrary, or violates principles of natural justice. The Tribunal's approach was deemed appropriate to expedite proceedings and align with the Act's objective of speedy case disposal.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Court rules against reinstatement of part-time teacher, emphasizing temporary appointment status.
The High Court overturned the School Tribunal Nagpur's decision directing the reinstatement of the respondent as a part-time teacher in a Science College. The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing that the respondent's appointment was temporary, not probationary, and that the Tribunal erred in interpreting the appointment as probationary under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Additionally, the Court found that the Tribunal should not have entertained the respondent's appeal beyond the prescribed time limit, highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for appeals.
Quick Glance (AI)
Collector Versus Intercity Cables System (P) Ltd.
S.P. Bharucha and K.S. Paripoornan, JJ. ORDER Appeal dismissed. ... ... ...
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Penalty upheld for transporting goods without documentation under Kerala Sales Tax Act
The court upheld the penalty imposed under section 29A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 for transporting goods without proper documentation. The lack of records during transportation led to suspicion of tax evasion, resulting in the conversion of the security deposit into a penalty. The judgment emphasized the significance of proper documentation, valuation of goods, and compliance with tax regulations. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the statutory powers under section 41 of the Act and highlighting the importance of maintaining accurate records during transportation processes.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Kerala High Court Upholds 10% Tax Addition in Estimation Case
The Kerala High Court upheld the 10% addition in a tax case based on the rejection of books of accounts and resort to estimation. The Court found the first appellate authority's reduction from 20% to 10% reasonable and supported by facts. Emphasizing each year as a separate assessment unit, the Court dismissed the tax revision case, affirming the lower authorities' decisions as adequately reasoned. The Appellate Tribunal's approval of the addition was deemed fair and not arbitrary, with no legal issues raised.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Kerala High Court Grants Concessional Tax Rate for Manufacturer of Rubber Products
The High Court of Kerala ruled in favor of the assessee, a manufacturer of Hawai chappals, allowing the claim for a concessional tax rate on the purchase turnover of rubber used for manufacturing rubber products for the assessment year 1988-89. The Court held that the assessee, a small-scale industrial unit, was entitled to the reduced tax rate of 3 per cent as per S.R.O. No. 641/81, specifically designed for manufacturers of finished rubber products within the State. The Court emphasized adherence to the provisions of S.R.O. No. 641/81 and dismissed reliance on irrelevant government orders and schedules, ultimately granting the petition.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Court stresses factual justifications in tax assessments, quashes orders, emphasizes proper scrutiny
The Court emphasized the importance of factual justifications in tax assessments, particularly in cases involving rejection of accounts and resorting to estimation under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. It highlighted that a jurisdictional error arises when rejection of accounts is unjustified, especially when based on minimal discrepancies observed during surprise inspections. The Court quashed the orders of all three authorities and directed a reassessment based on the amount shown by the assessee in the relevant form, stressing the need for proper jurisdictional scrutiny and rejecting reliance solely on compounding as a conclusive factor.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Tribunal reduces penalty in customs dispute over misdeclared goods, expert testing pivotal
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the value determination and reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 5,000. The dispute arose from misdeclaration of goods as leather belts instead of PVC leather belts, leading to discrepancies in valuation and customs clearance. The Tribunal's decision hinged on expert testing confirming the goods as PVC, not leather, impacting the imposed penalty and value assessment. The appellant's surrender of goods due to delays in adjudication influenced the outcome, with the penalty reduced primarily for misdeclaration issues.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Tribunal directs reevaluation of glass fiber vessel classification under Heading 70.14
The Tribunal set aside part of the order and directed the Commissioner to reconsider the classification of process vessels made of glass fiber reinforced plastic under Heading 70.14.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Manufacturer's cost of free gift not deductible as trade discount per CEGAT ruling+
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi held that the cost of a plastic mug provided as a free gift by a Cadbury's Bournvita manufacturer cannot be deducted as a trade discount from the assessable value, following precedent from Glaxo (I) Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur. The appeal was dismissed.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Success for Anand Water Meters in Appeal vs. Collector of Central Excise! Tribunal rules no related party status.
The appeal by M/s. Anand Water Meters Mfg. Co. against the Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Cochin was successful. The Tribunal determined that M/s. Punjab Anand Meters (P) Ltd. was not a related person to the appellants due to the absence of mutual interest or money flow back between the parties. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the previous order was overturned.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Tribunal Rules Nickel Catalyst & Alloy Powder Ineligible for Duty Exemption
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi considered the eligibility of Nickel Catalyst and Nickel Aluminium Alloy Powder for duty exemption under Notification No. 201/79 as amended for manufacturing Stearic Acid. The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) overturned the initial rejection, stating that these substances need not become part of the final product. However, the Tribunal, referencing precedents, ruled that the substances did not qualify as raw materials or component parts. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, overturning the Collector's decision in favor of the Revenue.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Tribunal: No duty hike on post-sale price changes without misdeclaration proof
The Tribunal held that duty liability does not arise on goods sold at a higher price from depots unless the approved assessable value is mis-declared. It emphasized that subsequent price revisions post-clearance from the factory do not automatically lead to additional duty liability, unless there is evidence of malafide actions or misdeclaration. The Tribunal clarified that duty reassessment is not warranted based on post-clearance price changes, and central excise authorities cannot reassess duty unless there is proof of misdeclaration at the time of clearance. The appeals were dismissed based on these findings.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Imported PVC machine for plastic soles eligible for duty exemption under Customs Notification. Tribunal ruled in favor.
The appellants imported a PVC direct injection soling machine claiming a concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 42/78-Cus. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding the machine eligible for exemption as it produced plastic footwear soles attached to leather uppers. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. (1996 (9) TMI 347 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI)
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Tribunal confirms copper-coated steel wires classification under Central Excise Tariff
The appeal was rejected as the Tribunal upheld the classification of copper coated steel wires under T.I. 26AA(ia) of the Central Excise Tariff, affirming that copper coating on steel wires does not amount to manufacturing.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)Headnote
Tribunal rules on company status and tax disallowance under section 43B, emphasizing legislative intent and strict interpretation.
The Tribunal determined that the assessee-company did not qualify as a company in which the public are substantially interested. Regarding the disallowance under section 43B for municipal taxes, the Tribunal overturned the decision, emphasizing the liability of the landlord for the taxes. The appeal was partially allowed, highlighting the significance of strict interpretation of tax provisions and considering legislative intent in tax assessments.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)Headnote
Partnership firm dissolution not taxable: Tribunal rules against short-term capital gains addition.
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the short-term capital gains addition in a case involving the dissolution of a partnership firm. The Tribunal determined that the distribution of assets upon firm dissolution did not constitute a taxable transfer under the Income-tax Act, based on legal precedents and the specific wording of relevant sections. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the deletion of the addition and emphasizing that capital gains tax liability does not arise in such circumstances.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Tribunal rules in favor of Revenue in IT appeals, upholds CIT(A) findings, adjusts valuation of silver articles (A)
The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeals in ITA Nos. 8419, 8422/Del/1991, and 5405/Del/1990, while dismissing the assessee's appeal in ITA No. 5899/Del/1990. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings on several issues but made adjustments where necessary, particularly in the valuation and ownership of silver articles.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)Headnote
Appeals Dismissed, Acquisition Decision Affirmed, Fair Market Value Emphasized
The appeals were dismissed, affirming the Appellate Tribunal's decision to set aside the acquisition proceedings. The court emphasized the need to consider all relevant factors in determining fair market value and cautioned against the misuse of acquisition provisions. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.
AI TextQuick Glance (AI)
Court quashes interim assessment, allows block assessment under Section 158BC to avoid conflicts.
The court quashed the interim assessment order for the year 1993-94 and allowed the Department to proceed with block assessment proceedings under section 158BC to avoid conflicting assessments. The judgment clarified the application of Chapter XIV-B for post-1995 searches, emphasizing its non-retrospective nature and the need to align assessments with block assessment procedures to ensure procedural compliance and prevent duplication.

Case Laws

Back

All Case Laws

Showing Results for : Law: AllYear: 1996 Volume: 9
Reset Filters
Showing
Records
ExpandCollapse

    Case Laws

    Back

    All Case Laws

    Showing Results for : Law: AllYear: 1996 Volume: 9 Reset Filters
    More details are visible to the Paid members. i.e:- Party Name, Court Name, Date of Decision, Full Text of Headnote and Decision etc.
    Case ID :

    📋
    Contents
    Note

    Note

    Note

    Bookmark

    print

    Print

    Login to TaxTMI
    Verification Pending

    The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

    Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

    Don't have an account? Register Here

    Topics

    ActsIncome Tax