Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
0 /50 characters
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles
Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
- 0 - Views
Order released without giving notice is contrary to the principles of natural justice
Date 19 Dec 2024
Written By
Issuing Penalties Without Notice Violates Natural Justice, Court Rules; Reinforces Proper Notice Under GST Regulations
The Madras High Court ruled that issuing an order without proper notice violates the principles of natural justice. In the case involving a subsidiary of a bio-CNG production company, goods transported from Gujarat to Chennai were intercepted, and penalties were imposed without notifying the petitioner. The court found this action contrary to natural justice, as the petitioner was not given a chance to defend. It directed that goods be released upon providing satisfactory security and instructed authorities to initiate new proceedings in accordance with the law. The decision emphasized the necessity of proper notice before imposing penalties under GST regulations.

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case TVL. SPARK BIO GAS PRIVATE LIMITED, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, MR. VISHWANATHAN SATISH VERSUS THE STATE TAX OFFICER (FAC) , STATE TAX OFFICER, JOINT COMMISSIONER (CT) , VELLORE DIVISION, VELLORE - 2024 (8) TMI 446 - MADRAS HIGH COURT held that an order released without giving proper notice is contrary to principles of natural justice. 

Facts:

Tvl. Spark Bio Gas (P.) Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of M/s. Mahasakthi Bio Enercon Private Limited (“the Holding Company”).  The holding company specialised in the production and bottling of bio-CNG and was awarded the concession by the Greater Chennai Corporation for the construction of six biogas plants. For fulfilment of the said purpose CEID Consultants and Engineering Private Limited (“the CEID) agreed to supply goods by procuring them from Power Hydrotech Private Limited (“the Power Hyderotech”). The transportation of the goods was to happen on “bill to ship” basic form Gujrat to Chennai with the petitioner named as consignee in the tax invoice.

The goods were intercepted by the authorities on the way from Gujrat to Chennai.  The Notices that were issued in Form GST MOV-1 and MOV-2 mentioned only CIED and Power Hydrotech.  Despite this the order (“the Impugned Order”) dated May 27, 2024 imposed penalties on the petitioner under section 129 of applicable GST statutes.

The petitioner contended that the impugned order was against the principles of natural justice as the petitioner was never given a chance to defend.

Issue:

Whether the issuing order without giving a chance to defend contrary to principles of Natural Justice?

Held:

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in TVL. SPARK BIO GAS PRIVATE LIMITED, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, MR. VISHWANATHAN SATISH VERSUS THE STATE TAX OFFICER (FAC) , STATE TAX OFFICER, JOINT COMMISSIONER (CT) , VELLORE DIVISION, VELLORE - 2024 (8) TMI 446 - MADRAS HIGH COURT held as under:

  • Observed that the petitioners were not served notice and were also not part of the proceeding and issuing an order against them was a violation of principles of natural justice.
  • Held that the impinged order was in contradiction of principles of natural justice.
  • Observed that, under Section 129(1)(c) of the applicable GST enactments the goods can be released upon furnishing proper bank guarantee or other security.
  • Directed that, the goods to be realised upon the petitioner providing satisfactory security.
  • Directed, the authorities to initiate new proceedings against the petitioner in accordance with the law. 

Our Comments:

Section 129 of the Central Goods and Servies Act “Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit” serves primarily the compliance of GST laws in I transportation of goods. It says:

  • The goods with suspicion of tax evasion can be detained.
  • The goods can be released upon payment of due taxes and penalties.
  • If the goods are not released within 7 days action is to be taken under Section 130.
  •  Proper notice tie be given to reply before issuing an order of penalty.

 (Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)

0 answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide

No Replies are present for this Article

Similar Articles
Recent Articles