Collector's Failure to Confiscate Seized Goods Leads to Compensation Claim; Board Stresses Importance of Confiscation Orders.
A recent case highlighted a situation where a Collector failed to order the confiscation of seized goods that were subsequently destroyed in a fire while stored in a government warehouse. As a result, ownership of the goods remained with the original owner, who is now seeking compensation. The Board emphasized that adjudicating authorities must issue confiscation orders if an offense is proven, regardless of the physical state of the goods. Confiscation transfers ownership to the government, preventing compensation claims. This principle should guide future cases to avoid similar issues.
Full Summary is availble for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick
reference only.