Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID : 113876
- 0 -

AMORTISATION REQUIREMENT UNDER GST

Date 18 Jun 2018
Replies5 Answers
Views 4504 Views

X(USA) has signed contract with Y(India) for production of goods & export to X.Mould was to be provided by X as per contract. X has given advance of ₹ 50 L to Y for purchase of mould in India & to be retained by Y for production. Y purchased mould from Z(India) & availed GST input on this. Should Y raise export invoice of mould to X(though physically to be retained by Y)? or Y shall add amortised cost of mould in export invoices of goods to X? is input eligible on purchase of mould by Y from z.

5 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
- 0
Replied on Jun 18, 2018
1.

Sir ,

It depends on the invoice raised by Z whether the invoice is raise in the name of Y or in the name of X but to be delivered to Y. If supply of mould by Z is to Y then Y can avail the credit and on exporting the mould to X on completion of production and supply programme he can claim the refund of ITC of gst paid on the mould. Under GST law amortization of mould cost is not comtyemplated.

- 0
Replied on Jun 18, 2018
2.

Pl. check point no. 1 of th Circular No. 47/21/2018-GST dtd. 08th June in matter.

- 0
Replied on Jul 27, 2018
3.

Sir,

in the said notification, i could not make any difference between 1.2 & 1.3.

can anyone explain to me with nice examples? thanks & regards

J Ramamurthy

- 0
Replied on Nov 17, 2018
4.

The most confusing circular is the circular dated 8th June 2018 regarding moulds and dies. It has raised more doubts rather than clarity.

- 0
Replied on Nov 17, 2018
5.

1.1 - situation where the tools are moved from the OEM to the component manufacturer. Not a supply. No tax payable. No reversal of credit.

1.2 Further clarifies point 1.1 that in such case no need to add the amortised value to the component.

1.3 situation (bill to ship to) - retained by the component manufacturer - no movement of tool from OEM to component manufacturer - Credit to be reversed. Amortised cost to be included in the value.

Had the clarification at point 1.2 be after 1.3, then the issue would have been clear. But that was not the intention.

Regards

S.Ramaswamy

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues