Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID : 120030
- 0 -

Transportation

Date 21 May 2025
Replies2 Answers
Views 312 Views
Asked By

A registered dealer getting inward services, and using the local transportation as freight Inward, the transporter is not a GTA as it is just a Bill/ Cash Memo issued by though the name is using Transport word. In my understanding it must fall under RCM, as goods or services are being received through an unregistered dealer.

Whether the transportation charges must fall under the ambit of composite supply?

Please consider both the points separately.

Thanks,

2 answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
- 0
Replied on May 21, 2025
1.

RCM on GTA services is applicable only when the transporter issues "Goods Consignment Note". Otherwise the recipient of mere local transport services without GC Note is not liable for RCM.

Reply
Hide
- 0
Replied on May 21, 2025
2.

A registered dealer receiving inward transportation services from a local transporter who does not issue a consignment note and only provides a bill or cash memo is not considered to be availing services from a GTA (Goods Transport Agency) under GST. Since the definition of a GTA specifically requires the issuance of a consignment note, the transporter in this case would not fall under that category. As such, reverse charge mechanism (RCM) under GST is not applicable, because RCM in the context of transportation applies only to services provided by a GTA to certain specified recipients. Moreover, even though the transporter is unregistered, there is no RCM liability on the recipient unless they fall under a specifically notified class of persons under Section 9(4), which currently does not apply to regular registered businesses.

Additionally, these transportation charges do not qualify as a composite supply. For a supply to be considered composite, it must consist of two or more supplies naturally bundled together and provided by the same supplier in conjunction with each other, where one is a principal supply. In this scenario, the transportation service is not bundled with the supply of goods—it is billed separately by a third-party transporter and not by the supplier of the goods. Therefore, the transportation service is an independent supply and should be treated as such for GST purposes.

Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues