TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1987 (1) TMI 163
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....1. That the ld. AAC has not taken into consideration the restriction imposed as per the lease deed of the society. 2. That the valuation has been estimated on the basis of agreement to sell deals without bringing anything on record and as such the action of the ld. ITO was arbitrary and unjust. 3. That the ld. AAC has acted arbitrarily in not making deduction of the lessor's share from the unear....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....assessee to explain as to why the low value of the plot was being shown. A reply dt.18th Feb., 1985was brought on record and reliance was also placed on the finding of ld. AAC for the asst. yr. 1976-77. The ld. AAC held for that year that the plot was not saleable and, therefore, its value should be taken at cost. Reliance was also placed on cl. 6 of the lease deed dt.30th Dec., 1974for the purpos....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ive House Building Society and that the said society as a builder and promoter allotted the plot to the assessee on the basis of perfectual sublease dt. 3rd Dec., 1974, copy of which is placed in the record. Shri Kapur argued that in view of the stringent condition mentioned in cl. 6 of the sublease deed the property was not transferable. Thus according to the ld. authorised representative the val....