1995 (6) TMI 76

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ive shortage in cloth. 2. Heard the parties. 3. The assessee purchases yarn and gets gray cloth prepared through M/s Rajasthan Processors (I) Ltd. At the assessment proceedings, the AO noted that the assessee had claimed shrinkage at 5.25% as against shrinkage of 3.91% in last year. On being asked to explain the increase in shrinkage percentage this year, it was explained that the variation in p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t reasons for deleting the addition made. Apart from that, the learned counsel for the assessee has advanced very learned arguments, with which we feel completely satisfied. 6. The learned counsel for the assessee is very right in his contention that the provisions of s. 145 cannot be made applicable until and unless the AO brings a case within the purview of either s. 145(1) or 145(2). In the pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... defects have been pointed out by the AO in such record. The learned CIT(A) has further pointed out that the shrinkage did not exceed 4.9% in this year and the AO had wrongly taken that at 5.25%. Taking into account all the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that the learned CIT(A) has deleted the addition in question for very sound and cogent reasons. There is thus no force .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X