Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1978 (8) TMI 123

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d computed the interest of the assessee in the industrial undertaking at Rs. 45,132. Though there is no discussion in the order of assessment, it transpires that in making such computation the WTO had, in terms of r. 2--I of the WT Rules, considered as the starting point only assets excluding assets in the shape of factory building and land. 2. The assessee appealed to the AAC. In order to appreciate the contentions of the assessee in the appeal before us, we would set out the working of the AAC for the asst. yr. 1973-74 as under: . . Rs. Rs. "Gross assets as per balance sheet as on 31st March, 1973 . 41,72,737 Deduct: (1) Land as per Balance sheet 25,742 . (2) Building as per Balance sheet 3,35,524 . (3) Investment a per Bala....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....WTO and the AAC have taken the interpretation that the assets have to exclude land, building and rights in land and building of whatsoever nature whereas the learned counsel submitted that what can be excluded is only that type of land or building or rights in such land or building as would fall under other sub-sections of s. 5(1), such as, for example, the building under s. 5(1)(iv) to the stipulated extent of value or the land in s. 5(1)(iv)(a) etc.--of course subject to the monetary limit in s. 5(1A). 5. According to the learned Departmental Representative, land or building or interest in land or building of any nature had to be left out of consideration from the value of assets and also such other assets as are referred to in other sub....