Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1989 (9) TMI 246

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... able products. The appellants sent out some of the inputs (in respect of which they availed MODVAT credit) to another unit for purpose of processing and ultimate use in the finished product which were declared by them, without obtaining permission from the authorities. The appellant, however, reversed a sum of Rs. 66,117.74 representing as MODVAT credit on their being pointed out by the authorities that they had sent the inputs outside without following the procedure, as laid down under Rule 57F(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. This Rule envisages a permission to be obtained for the purpose. The appellants, after reversing the MODVAT credit, approached the authorities for restoring the credit after according necessary permission. The r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt the inputs out for processing without obtaining the permission of the competent authority as required under Rule 57F(2). The plead taken by the appellants is that they had nothing to gain by not taking permission as the inputs in question were used in the finished end-product declared by them. The learned Advocate was asked during the course of hearing whether he could satisfy the authorities that the said inputs, which had been sent to the other unit for processing, were ultimately used in the finished product, he has pleaded that the records would bear it out. 5. We also observe that the authorities on an application from the appellants for the same inputs have accorded permission under Rule 57F(2), for removal of the input to the ot .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e final products, provided that the waste, if any, arising in the course of such operations is also returned to the said factory; or (b) for the purpose of manufacture of intermediate products necessary for the manufacture of the final products and return the said intermediate products to his factory for further use in the manufacture of the final products, provided that the waste, if any, arising in the course of manufacture of such intermediate products is also returned to the said factory: Provided that the said waste need not be returned to the said factory if the appropriate duty of excise leviable thereon has been paid." It is seen that the requirement of Rule 57F(2) is that the appellants should apply for the permission in regard .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e present case is similar to the one in the case of Chapter X procedure or Rule 56A procedure under which certain procedural requirements like application for availing of the benefit of the concession and the permission etc. for the same are provided. The issue regarding the non-compliance with these provisions and the denial of the concession under the said provisions has come up before this Tribunal in a number of cases. This Tribunal has taken the decision that so long as there is substantial compliance with the provision of law as set out in a notification or of the Rule, the benefit could not be denied for a procedural lapse. It is observed that the credit under the Rules of the MODVAT scheme is available, if the inputs and the finishe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nal facility given for the legislative purpose cannot be done. Only after examining this aspect the benefit of the relief provided can be denied. In the instant case we find the appellants for subsequent period have been given permission for removing the same inputs for processing outside the factory and necessary parameters exist for the purpose of verification as to whether the inputs earlier removed were utilised for the purpose for which the MODVAT concession had been legislated. In this background, therefore, we hold that the lower authority should re-examine the matter and determine whether with reference to the records it can be verified that the inputs which were sent out and after reprocessing have been received back and the ultima .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates