Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1990 (11) TMI 262

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ree months, the present COD application was filed by the Revenue praying for condonation of delay in filing the supplementary Appeal. In similar cases, where the main appeals were filed within the statutory time-limit, but the supplementary appeals were filed after expiry of the three months statutory time-limit, this Tribunal has been condoning the delay in filing the supplementary appeals. Following the consistent view taken in such matters, we condoned the delay in filing the supplementary appeal in this case. Thereafter, we heard both the appeals together. 2. By the impugned order, the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) has set aside the order-in-original No. 19/DC/85/ADS dated 28-6-1985 passed by the Deputy Collector of Central E .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 1983-84 to be Rs. 3,27,566.00. 4. During investigation of the case the Central Excise Officers recorded statements of partners of both the firms. In his statement recorded on 21-6-1984, Shri Vijaykumar Naginbhai Patel, Partner of Divyam Chemical Industries stated that Ball Mill/Pulveriser had not been installed in their factory, they were sending their semi-finished goods to M/s. Patco Chemical Industries for pulverising process - that their boiler was not in working condition and that they were taking steam through pipeline from M/s. Patco Chemical Industries and they did not pay any charges for supply of steam. They were utilising the services of Production Manager of Patco Chemical Industries, they had no laboratory for testing their .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tivated carbon shown to have been manufactured during August 83 - 23-12-1983 could not be manufactured by that firm and the said quantity was obviously manufactured by M/s. Patco Chemical Industries, but shown to have been cleared in the invoices of M/s. Divyam Chemical Industries. Another quantity of 7640 Kgs. of activated carbon shown to have been sold to M/s. Patco Chemical Industries appeared to be in semi-finished condition and sold by the latter firm after carrying out the processes of washing, blending by adding charcoal, adding acids and packing etc. under their brand-name. Further, a quantity aggregating to 4260 Kgs. of activated carbon cleared under Consignment Notes No. 627 dated 11-5-1983, No. 639, dated 8-7-1983, No. 782, dated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ing under Tariff Item No. 68 and they were sending semi-finished goods to M/s. Patco Chemical Industries for further processing. In ground No. 2 of the appeal, the Revenue has stated that the log book maintenance by M/s. Divyam Chemical Industries showed that they started production from 23-12-1988. Therefore, the production of 22,470 Kgs. of activated carbon from 10-8-1983 to 23-12-1983 could not have been manufactured by them in the light of the above facts. In the third ground of the appeal, it is stated that M/s. Patco Chemical Industries purchased 7640 Kgs. of activated carbon from M/s. Divyam Chemical Industries in semi-finished condition and carried out processes of washing, blending by adding charcoal, adding acids and packing etc. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the order of the Deputy Collector, various allegations have been discussed in details. We observed that the Collector (Appeals) has not discussed all those allegations and findings given by the Deputy Collector in the order-in-original. Collector (Appeals) clubbed together the clearances of the two firms taking into consideration certain aspects, but the most important point has been totally ignored by him. The point is that M/s. Divyam Chemical Industries did not have complete plant and machinery to manufacture activated carbon. This is an admitted fact. It is also an admitted fact that in the absence of complete machinery semi-finished goods were being sent by them to their sister concern M/s. Patco Chemical Industries and the latter use .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates