Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1993 (1) TMI 177

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appeal against the order in original bearing No. 11/MP/89, dated 8-5-1989 passed by the Addl. Collector of Central Excise, Vadodara. 2. The appellants are manufacturers of carbon black. They removed two consignments of carbon black each weighing 10.000 M.T. in Nov., 1984. However these goods were returned by the consignee M/s. CEAT Tyres of India, Limited. The returned goods were received b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d under D-3 declaration, they were not processed separately and hence identity is lost and the provisions of Rule 173H would not be available. The fact that the goods were not separately processed was suppressed from the Department and hence the extended period was sought to be applied. In the adjudication proceedings held by the Addl. Collector a demand for the duty amounting to Rs. 41,265 was co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....articular grade of carbon black in the production stream. No objection could be taken to that and there is no requirement even as per the Rules that whenever the returned goods are taken for process, it should be intimated to the Department. Hence, there cannot be any suppression of this fact, when the law does not provide for this. 4. After hearing both the sides, though I may not be able t....