Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1996 (6) TMI 210

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R.J. Parakh, Advocate, for the Respondents. [Order]. -  Though, both the appeals are directed against different captioned orders, since the issue involved is common, they were taken up together for hearing and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. Appeal No. E/83/93 from M/s. Pearl Soap Company is against the captioned order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-II di....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the ld. SDR. He has supported the order and has submitted that cellophane tapes would go as secondary packing and would not be eligible for Modvat credit. 5. Considering the submissions and going through the records, rejection of the Modvat credit is only on the ground that the item used is auxiliary to the cardboard boxes and not as an input and hence Modvat credit is not eligible. One cann....