Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1997 (2) TMI 227

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y the authorities. The second issue is whether the demand is time barred. 2. Shri C.S. Lodha, ld. Advocate appearing for the appellants narrated the facts and submitted that the appellants purchased ultramarine blue in bulk packing and repacked them in smaller packings. He submits that the manufacturers of ultramarine blue were paying duty under Chapter Heading 32.06 and the appellants were not paying duty on the product; that CBEC issued a clarification on 7th December, 1990 stating that ultramarine blue in bulk form is appropriately classifiable under Chapter 32.06 and the same when put up in a small packing would be classified under Heading 32.12 of the CETA, 1985. He submits that consequent upon the issue of this clarification, the de .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ents in which the judgment of various other High Courts were also taken into consideration. He submits that the ratio of these judgments covers their case on all fours and therefore, prays that insofar as the merits of the case are concerned, the appeal may be allowed. 4. On the question of limitation, ld. Counsel submits that the Govt. of India issued a notification u/s 11C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 which clearly shows that there were different practices being followed insofar as dutiability of the product was concerned. He submits that limitation also, is applicable in their case. 5. Shri A.K. Madan, ld. SDR reiterated the findings of the lower authorities. 6. Heard the submissions of both sides. We find that the main contenti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... under Chapter sub-heading 3206.90. We also note that in the present case, the tariff under chapter note to this Chapter Heading 32 to the effect that packing of ultramarine blue in a small packing will amount to manufacture has been introduced by the Finance Act, 1995. 7. We also observe that since the practice of non-payment of duty on repacking of ultramarine blue was recognised by the Govt. by issue of a notification under Section 11C. We find that the demand beyond a period of six months will not be enforceable and we hold accordingly. 8. In the result, the impugned order is set aside and the appeals are allowed. Consequential relief, if any, shall be admissible to the appellants in accordance with law. - - TaxTMI - TMITax - Ce .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates