Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1997 (1) TMI 246

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llant filed this appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. 61-CE/APPL/IND/96, dated 18-1-1996 whereby the refund claim of the appellant was rejected. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in manufacture of auto mobile gears. The respondents issued a show cause notice to appellant asking them to pay the Excise duty amounting to Rs. 4,63,309.00/- as clearance made between....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ility of differential duty on the appellant. He relied upon the decision of Hon'ble High Court in case of Tan India v. Principal Collector reported in 1996 (82) E.L.T. 448 (Mad.) = 1995 (58) ECR 7 and submitted that there is no provision for interest on the differential amount of duty. He prays that the appeal be allowed. 4. Shri Jangir Singh, ld. JDR appearing on behalf of the respondents r....