Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1998 (3) TMI 248

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....K. Jain, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - Both the above appeals involve a common issue and are hence heard together and disposed of by this common order. The details of the appeals are as under : Sl. No. Appeal No. Period of demand Duty amount Rs. Date of show cause notice 1. E/5950/92-C July 90 to Oct. 90 14,02,336 BED + 70,117 SED 29-11-19....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....roduct in the instant case was pesticides, attracting nil rate, show cause notices were issued proposing recovery of duty on CMB Acid Chloride as set out in the table above. In respect of show cause notice dated 29-11-1990, the Assistant Collector confirmed duty demand. In addition, he imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,500/-. The Collector (Appeals) while upholding the duty demand, set aside the penalty.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on'ble Supreme Court in the case of N.B. Sanjana v. The Elphinstone Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. reported in 1978 (2) E.L.T. (J 399) (para 14) and the Supreme Court decision in the case of Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta v. National Tobacco Company of India Ltd. reported in 1978 (2) E.L.T. (J 416). He further contended that in contrast to the wordings in the Notification 214....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... very clear that levy must be something more than zero or Nil rate and that Nil rate of duty is not to be considered as the duty leviable. 5. We have carefully considered the rival submissions. The dispute is with reference to the interpretation of the expression "on which duty of excise is leviable whether in whole or in part". If it is held that, for the purpose of Notification 214/86, nil....