Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1999 (2) TMI 191

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... premises on 12-9-1995 that the appellants herein had been allegedly sending semi-finished steering wheels to one of the job workers, namely PPAI for finishing after carrying out two tests before the goods became marketable. Those two processes are (1) reaming process and (2) run out testing. These were sent out because it was alleged by the appellants that they did not have the facility for these two tests. Department in the course of investigation found on the basis of several statements and several challans and other records that PPAI was closed, that the goods so sent to PPAI were actually finished goods and it was only in the garb of semi- finished goods, that they were cleared without payment of duty. The goods sent to PPAI were actua....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....therefore, they could not carry out any finishing operations. He submits that this finding of the adjudicating authority is not correct because PPAI was only closed for a short period in the middle of August, 1995 when the officers visited the premises. It does not mean that PPAI was closed throughout the relevant period i.e. April, 1992 to Sept. 1995. No enquiry has been made from any responsible person of PPAI. He further submits that even when the goods were being sent to PPAI during the closure period of their unit, PPAI was getting the goods finished from another unit, M/s. Coolwells. Learned Advocate, therefore, submits that the conclusion drawn by the adjudicating authority that no finishing operations were carried out by PPAI during....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eipt back of the goods, after carrying out the necessary job work, sent by the appellants to various job workers of 57F(3) challans. There is absolutely no finding, submits the learned Advocate, on the said statements and the said reply submitted by the appellants. 4. We have carefully considered the pleas advanced from both sides. We observe that department is not denying that a large number of 57F(3) challans have been issued not only to PPAI but to others as well. Five job workers to whom the job work for carrying out the same two operations, namely, reaming process and run out testing were also carried out by those five workers. A very clear plea was taken by the appellants before the adjudicating authority that no enquiry whatsoe....