1999 (6) TMI 149
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bsp;In this appeal, filed by M/s. B.S. Patel, Yeotmal, the matter relates to the classification of goods, which were sold under the brand name of (1) Chetan Pandharpuri Zarda; and (2) Chetan Lawangi Zarda. Before 1-3-1986, the appellants were paying central excise duty on these products as branded chewing tobacco. On introduction of the new Central Excise Tariff, they pleaded that the goods did no....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....2-1987 to 23-6-1987. The main ground of filing of the refund claim was that the goods cleared by them would continue to remain as un-manufactured tobacco. The claim was not substantiated. A show cause notice was issued and the matter was decided by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, who observed that the assessee had filed refund claim on 28-7-1987 when the goods had already been passed fo....