Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2001 (7) TMI 414

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dent. [Order]. - This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. 1081, dated 19-12-2000 of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi. Under the order the Commissioner upheld duty demand of about Rs. 86,000/- and confirmed penalty of Rs. 50,000/- on the appellant. 2. The case relates to shortage of finished goods and raw material observed in the appellant's factory upon s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed by the Assistant Commissioner under Order No. 416/98-99, dated 28-1-1999 confirming duty demand of Rs. 86,483/- and imposing penalty of Rs. 86,000/- under Rules 173Q and 226 of the Central Excise Rules. The impugned order in appeal was passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the appeal filed against that adjudication order. 3. The submission of the appellant is that the entire raw materia....