TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2000 (12) TMI 744
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - After hearing Shri B.N. Chattopadhyay, ld. Consultant and Shri A.K. Chattopadhyay, ld. JDR, I dispense with the condition of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 1,91,540.52 involved in all the four appeals and penalty of Rs. 8,000/- I take up the appeals itself for disposal with the consent of both the sides. 2. The above demand has been confirmed by the autho....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the invoices as 'duplicate for transporter' is in compliance with the provisions of the relevant rules and the substantive benefit of the Modvat credit, in the absence of any allegations or findings of the inputs having not been received by the appellant and having not been utilised by them, cannot be denied on the said technical grounds. 3. The second ground on which the credit has been de....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t where the invoices are in the name of head office/regd. office of the assessee, credit should not be denied where the entire consignment covered by the invoices is received in the factory in original packed condition and the duplicate copy of the invoice endorsed. He submits that there is no dispute that the entire consignment was received by them in their factory. The observations of the Commis....