9911796707
Advanced Search 
TMI Blog1995 (11) TMI 309X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... HI AND S.P. BAGLA, MEMBERS A.K. Jain for the Petitioner. R.L. Khatri for the Respondent. ORDER Mr. Justice S.S. Chadha, Member - This revision petition has arisen out of the order dated 29-9-1994 of the Rajasthan State Commission at Jaipur dismissing as barred by time the revision petition against the order dated 4-1-1994 of the District Forum, Bharatpur which accepted the complaint an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed that she wrote various letters and reminders to the petitioner herein for sending back those shares after effecting the transfer but the petitioner herein has not effected the transfer or returned the shares after effecting their transfer. The com- plainant claimed damages on account of economic loss, as she alleged that she could not sell the shares when the price of the same had risen to Rs. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... te Commission in limine on the ground of limitation by its order dated 29-9-1994. 5. It has been brought on record by the petitioner herein that subsequent to the telegram dated 25-2-1994 sent to the District Forum, it scrutinised its record and upon detailed scrutiny, it came to the knowledge of the petitioner herein that the said share scrips of 100 shares bearing distinctive numbers 19996601-1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... with the petitioner herein while the complainant is claiming to have sent them for transfer to the petitioner company on 2-9-1992 by registered post which had never been received by the petitioner herein. 6. We have considered the arguments and have perused the record. The petitioner herein did not avail of the opportunity afforded by the District Forum and was merely content by sending telegram ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
