TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2001 (3) TMI 817
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ee is directed against order dated 3-2-1992 passed by CIT(A) for assessment year 1990-91. 2. Ground No. 1 is general in nature and needs no comments. 3. Ground No. 2 reads as under :- "Ld. CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law is not having adjudicated the assessee's ground of appeal taken before him to the effect that addition amounting to Rs. 1,55,867 being on account of purchases made fr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... had been deputed. Thus, Assessing Officer treated the purchases as fictitious and the books of account so prepared by the assessee and purchases made from Khan Packages were disallowed to the tune of Rs. 16,627. On appeal CIT(A) has held, thus :- "...As per statement of facts, the appellant has not given any explanation to this effect. The appellant had furnished address of the party as 154 Indu....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ank. He submitted that the bills in question are available with the assessee but the same could not anyhow be produced before lower authorities. Ld. counsel has reiterated that the assessee had made purchases from Khan Packages during the year under consideration and at that time the party was doing business at the given address. They have no knowledge as to when the party has closed its business ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Therefore, we are of the view that Assessing Officer was justified in treating the purchases from the said party as fictitious and disallowing the claim. We, therefore, uphold the impugned order in this regard. 4. Ground No. 3 relates to an order confirming the add back of Rs. 15,133 out of expenses on account of wages and salary claimed at Rs. 55,133. The assessee has claimed Rs. 55,133 on acco....