Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2001 (5) TMI 844

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri V.K. Chaturvedi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - This is an application filed under the provision of Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellants have prayed for review of order No. A-94-95, dt. 23-1-2001 passed by the Tribunal vide which the quantum of personal penalties imposed upon them was reduced to 25% in each case. 2. Shri R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CE, Jaipur v. Bhilwara Spinners - 2000 (118) E.L.T. 248 (T-LB) = 2000 (38) RLT 600 (CEGAT-LB), has held that the Asstt. Commissioner has unlimited monetary powers for issuing demand notice for the normal period of limitation. As such the appellants' contention that the Asstt. Commissioner was having no jurisdiction to decide the present matter does not have any merits. The same is accordingly reje....