Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2003 (4) TMI 308

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - The issue in this appeal is whether the refund claim made under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 could be rejected on the grounds that the classifications and chargeability to C.V. Duty has been determined and the said assessments have not been challenged. The lower authorities have rejected the refund applications only on the ground that in re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (i)     after considering the provisions of Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 it was held that if the refund claim cannot be made as the order of assessment itself has not been got set aside by filing a separate appeal against such an order, then provisions of Section 27(1)(i) will be rendered totally nugatory and meaningless. If this view is to be accepted, it would mean th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... refund, the rejection of the same was found not correct. It was set aside and the matter was remanded back to the Assistant Collector to decide the claim of the assessee. (iii)   It was also held that availing of a refund claim would itself amount to filing a request for re-assessment and the Bill of Entry by the proper order and thereafter a refund would require to be met as per the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that the provisions of the Section 11B of the Central Excise Act and Section 27 were not para-materia. (b)     The Advocate for the appellants have relied upon the case of MSCO Pvt. Ltd. v. U.O.I. & Ors. - 1985 (19) E.L.T. 15 (S.C.) and on Shiv Shankar Dal Mills v. State of Haryana & Others (AIR 1980 SC 1037) to submit that if money recovered under colour of public laws is lat....