Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2003 (1) TMI 500

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. [Order per : G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J)]. - This appeal arises out of and is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 1/2001 (H-I) Cus., dated 21-5-2001 passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Hyderabad. 2. The appellants are 100% EOU. Shri Jagapathi Rao, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that the point to be considered in this appeal is whethe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red in the EOU. Nevertheless (goods) raw materials imported are eligible for remissions in terms of Section 23(1) of the Customs Act. In support of his contention he referred to the following decisions. (1) Tajmahal Hotel v. CC, Bombay [1995 (80) E.L.T. 588 (T)] (2) Winsome Yarn Ltd. v. CCE, Chandigarh [2001 (134) E.L.T. 686 (T) = 2001 (47) RLT 559 (CEGAT-Del.)] (3) CCE & C, Surat-II v. Welspun....