2003 (9) TMI 492

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der]. - After dispensing with the condition of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 18,210.61 (Rupees eighteen thousand two hundred ten and paise sixty-one) against the first applicant/appellant company, M/s. ERI-Tech Limited, along with the imposition of an identical amount of penalty under the provisions of Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and also the penalty of Rs.  10,000.00 (Rupees....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en at the job worker's factory, would be returned to them and in case of failure they would be liable to pay duty. 3. The appellants' contention duly represented by Sri K.L. Binani, Director of the appellant company, is that the dross arisen in the job worker's factory for the period from November, 1995 to 2000, was on account of invisible loss to the extent of 1%. There is no actual dross a....