2002 (4) TMI 863
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ave for respondent No. 1, Ms. Davawala for respondent No. 2 waive service of rule. With the consent of learned advocates for the parties matter is taken up for final hearing. 2. The present petition is filed by the petitioner against the order dated 26-9-2000 passed by the Regional Director, Western Region, Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs, Bombay, Govt. of India, the respondent No. 2....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n, the respondent No. 2 has only recorded the submissions of the rival sides and no reasons, whatsoever, are recorded saying as to how and in what manner he is accepting the submissions of either party for passing the order under section 22(1)(b) of the Act. In the matter of exercise of powers under section 22 of the Act, I am of the view that since final order passed under section 22 of the Act r....