Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2004 (7) TMI 406

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. - The issue involved in this Appeal filed by M/s. Mardia Chemicals Ltd. is whether the Revenue can adjust the duty amount due from the Appellants out of the amount of refund sanctioned to them. Shri R.S. Dinkar, learned Advocate submitted that demand of  Rs. 35,05,293/- was confirmed against them under Order-in-Original No. 408/Demand....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iven amount refundable to the appellants. 2. Learned Advocate, further, submitted that the Department should not have made the adjustment against the other confirmed demands and refund sanctioned to them should have been paid to the Appellants as the Assistant Commissioner has given a specific finding that the bar of unjust enrichment does not apply; that, further, in respect of five confirm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rovisions of Section 11 of the Central Excise Act to adjust against the amount of refund sanctioned to the Appellants; that as afterwards the demands have been set aside by the Tribunal, the Appellants are required to file fresh claims for refund of duty. 4. We have considered the submissions of both the sides. Section 11 of the Central Excise Act contains provisions for the recovery of sums....