TMI Blog2005 (10) TMI 344X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ides. 2. The appellant filed these appeals against the common Order-in-Appeal whereby their truck was absolutely confiscated and personal penalties of Rs. 10,000/- each were imposed on the appellant. The appellant Sukhbir Kaur was the owner of the truck and Harbinder Singh is the husband of Sukhbir Kaur. 3. The case of the Revenue is that on 7-4-2002 a truck was intercepted at Raxaul and some ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pellant at whose instance the contraband goods were carried in the truck. The contention is that the preset appellant are not involved in any activity which violates the provisions of Customs Act, therefore, order is not sustainable. 5. The contention of the Revenue is that certain remains of oxy-tetracyclene was recovered from the cavity of the truck which shows that the truck was earlier used ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
