Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2005 (10) TMI 351

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J) (Oral)]. - The Commissioner has demanded differential duty of over Rs. 5 lakhs from the appellants in respect of two consignments of concrete paving blocks imported by them in June 2000. This demand is consequential to enhancement of value of the goods on the basis of domestic market price of the goods in the country of exportation (UAE). In respect of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct, 1962. In this connection, it is submitted by the Consultant that the said penalty was not warranted in this case as the show cause notice was issued under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962 and not under Section 28. The basis of' this submission is that any penalty under Section 114A of the Act is relatable only to a demand of duty under Section 28(2) of the Act. Learned SDR, again, is falli....